-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
be explicit about ports for workers and servers #217
Merged
technosophos
merged 3 commits into
oam-dev:master
from
technosophos:fix/199-define-errors-for-server-worker
Oct 15, 2019
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this might cause weird & hard to debug errors. Is there a specific reason for making this to be not required?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes -- issue #182
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And this was complicated by the fact that the way different platforms measure CPU and memory turn out to be different, as we discovered on Kubernetes a few weeks back.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or maybe I should ask. In Kubernetes, a sensible default for CPU is somewhere around
0.05
and maybe0.1
, because in Kubernetes, this is how much of a Kubernetes Node's actual CPU you need. I am assuming that for SF, the sane default is1
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can do fractional cores as well, but I am thinking of cases where the default causes activation of the container to fail and makes it hard and not obvious for the operator to debug(we have seen such cases when we were doing SF Mesh).
Also, the issue #182 mentions Resources are optional for containers, they are mandatory as well in the current schema(is that comment meaning different resources than this one below?).
resources | Resources | Y | | Resources required by the container.-- | -- | -- | -- | --
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed that section from this PR, opening another PR to deal with just #182