Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unimportant articles in Football selection welcome page #15

Open
Popolechien opened this issue Apr 19, 2019 · 8 comments
Open

Unimportant articles in Football selection welcome page #15

Popolechien opened this issue Apr 19, 2019 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Popolechien
Copy link

The latest Football selection has a couple of false positives on the landing page (ie. top 100 articles):

  • Niels Bohr;
  • Drew Carey;
  • George Soros.

Obviously these may have some relationship to football but probably aren't great at it (or worth making it to the top 100).

@kelson42 kelson42 self-assigned this Apr 19, 2019
@kelson42
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, we should somehow have a topic specific score

@Popolechien
Copy link
Author

That would probably be the easy way out but if that rating is based on enwp then it would negatively impact other languages (e.g. a German or Spanish team might get low ranking while it would be high on its native wiki).

Can't we simply say that low-ranking articles should be excluded from the landing page/Top100?

@kelson42
Copy link
Contributor

Scores are wiki specific. We produce now selections sorted by scores. The solution you propose does not really fit to the current architecture as we have no way to directly control what is on the welcome page, this is just the first 100 elements of the selection. To me this bug is just the symptom that the project article list is sorted on generic criterias whereas the project centric evaluation should be prominent.

@kelson42 kelson42 changed the title False positives in Football selection Unimportant articles in Football selection welcome page Oct 13, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 13, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be now be reviewed manually. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 13, 2020
@kelson42 kelson42 added enhancement and removed bug labels Apr 18, 2020
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Apr 18, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 17, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be now be reviewed manually. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 17, 2020
@Popolechien
Copy link
Author

Looks a lot (yet different) like #16 and in the end looks mostly solved by now.

@kelson42
Copy link
Contributor

No, no, the real solution is not implemented.

@kelson42 kelson42 reopened this Jun 25, 2020
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jun 25, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 24, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be now be reviewed manually. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Aug 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants