You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the way TOP articles are selectied is obviously not based on popularity, as I find it hard to believe that among enwp's 6.2 million articles such things as crinoid or the List of National Historic Landmarks in Indiana would make it among the 1% most viewed/popular/documented - yet they made it to the enwp TOP (wikipedia_en_top_maxi_2020-10.zim)frontpage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be now be reviewed manually. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be now be reviewed manually. Thank you for your contributions.
Currently the way TOP articles are selectied is obviously not based on popularity, as I find it hard to believe that among enwp's 6.2 million articles such things as crinoid or the List of National Historic Landmarks in Indiana would make it among the 1% most viewed/popular/documented - yet they made it to the enwp TOP (wikipedia_en_top_maxi_2020-10.zim)frontpage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: