Run EdgeX 3.1 without consul #243
Unanswered
SynchronicIT
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
We plan to replace Consul with another self-developed lightweight Config Provider & Registry in v3.2. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Which project is it? I am interesting the same to run the edgex with a lightweight "Consul".
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Consul is currently used as Registry and Configuration Provider. We use EdgeX in small devices which are not always running.
Consul is the only application / docker which doesn't like to get rebooted or being switched off for longer than a week.
The actual added value vs. the cost in storage, ram and CPU is not in balance.
Can we also run without Consul and how should that look like?
And alternatively, could Consul be replaced by a much more lightweight application? (e.g. which uses the RedisDB only for some config and the rest is in-memory)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions