You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As mentioned on TeX.SE, the delimiters are missing if an @misc contains multiple entries in the organization field. This may be due to line 548 in apa.bbx where the list format for misc is redefined with the following line: \DeclareListFormat[misc]{organization}{\mkbibemph{#1}}.
Thus, the usual listcount test is overwritten respectively deleted. You shall insert something like:
Just looked at your commit. In line 555, you use DeclareDelimFormat with the entryfieldorganization as context argument. AFAIK the optional context argument for this command can't be an entryfield, but has to be something like bib, biblist or a cite-command (Manual p. 129 ff.).
But since you're also one of the biblatex authors, I may be wrong. If thats the case, just forget my comment here... ;)
The context is basically arbitrary and is determined by \printdelim but you were right to note that that context wasn't being established anyway ... should be fixed now.
As mentioned on TeX.SE, the delimiters are missing if an
@misc
contains multiple entries in theorganization
field. This may be due to line548
inapa.bbx
where the list format formisc
is redefined with the following line:\DeclareListFormat[misc]{organization}{\mkbibemph{#1}}
.Thus, the usual listcount test is overwritten respectively deleted. You shall insert something like:
Or even some more sophisticated code which decides, if a
multilistdelimiter
or afinallistdelimiter
should be inserted.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: