-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
concat::fragment does not seem to notify properly #740
Comments
looks like this could be the same issue as MODULES-7533 (also see #430) |
For some reason these meta parameters are explicitly not copied here:
It was introduced in dd88b1a but it doesn't explain why those were excluded. |
IMHO, one should use concat's resource notify, not an single fragment - result is the same, isn't it? |
I can imagine cases where one fragment should notify the service, but not another. |
A real world example we have for this is the puppet.conf file on the puppetserver. most changes to this file are only read by the agent and dont require any notify. however changes to the |
Describe the Bug
When using a
notify
meta parameter in aconcat::fragment
, the target resource doesn't get notified.Expected Behavior
When a
concat::fragment
's state changes, it should properly notify the target resource.Steps to Reproduce
Example code:
foo
is running/tmp/foo
is not presentpuppet apply
on the above codeAs you can see, even though the file changed, it didn't trigger restart of the service.
Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: