-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update v1.py #796
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update v1.py #796
Conversation
Multi-Slicer window
Hello there :) |
Hi,
I would like to introduce the possibility of applying multiple slicers of different sizes in order to obtain a more accurate detection for smaller and larger elements within the given input image.
Thanks,
Valentina
Valentina Faraco
AI Software Engineer
***@***.******@***.***>
+39 3346876153
[cid:ae0a2b13-ad22-405b-b6ca-a69024b6c855]
WWW.LUTECH.GROUP<https://lutech.group/>
Lutech SpA • Via Orfeo Mazzitelli, 258/e 70124, Bari (BA), Italia
P.IVA 02824320176 – Milano – REA-MI 1666842
…________________________________
Da: Paweł Pęczek ***@***.***>
Inviato: martedì 12 novembre 2024 11:15
A: roboflow/inference ***@***.***>
Cc: Valentina Faraco ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Oggetto: [EXT] Re: [roboflow/inference] Update v1.py (PR #796)
Non ricevi spesso messaggi di posta elettronica da ***@***.*** Scopri perché è importante<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
Hello there :)
Thanks for contribution - could you elaborate more on the type of change you want to introduce?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#796 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BM3UWP27H4XCVBNJVDMT4ID2AHIL5AVCNFSM6AAAAABRTUMWBKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZQGEZDQMRQGI>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Il contenuto di questo messaggio e-mail e di ogni eventuale allegato è strettamente confidenziale e indirizzato esclusivamente al destinatario indicato. Tutte le informazioni contenute sono soggette ad obbligo di riservatezza ai sensi del Regolamento UE 2016/679 GDPR e del D.Lgs 196/2003 e sm. Il trattamento non autorizzato del contenuto trasmesso e/o allegato dal mittente è vietato. In caso di erronea ricezione il destinatario è pregato di contattare immediatamente il mittente e cancellare al più presto il messaggio. Grazie.
The contents and any attachments of this e-mail are strictly confidential and addressed exclusively to the designated addressee. Any information in this e-mail is subject to an obligation of confidentiality in accordance with EU regulation 2016/679 and D.Lgs. 196/2003. Unauthorized treatment of the content and/or any attachments of this e-mail is forbidden. In the event of incorrect reception the recipient must immediately contact the sender and delete as soon as possible the e-mail. Thank you.
Lutech Spa – P.IVA 02824320176 – Milano – REA-MI 1666842
|
ok, that's a valid idea but I cannot approve the change in a form as is - I believe it may not work (change of the |
How can this part be integrated?
Valentina Faraco
AI Software Engineer
***@***.******@***.***>
+39 3346876153
[cid:2b95226e-a30e-41f1-b10c-87af8497d2ea]
WWW.LUTECH.GROUP<https://lutech.group/>
Lutech SpA • Via Orfeo Mazzitelli, 258/e 70124, Bari (BA), Italia
P.IVA 02824320176 – Milano – REA-MI 1666842
…________________________________
Da: Paweł Pęczek ***@***.***>
Inviato: martedì 12 novembre 2024 11:26
A: roboflow/inference ***@***.***>
Cc: Valentina Faraco ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Oggetto: [EXT] Re: [roboflow/inference] Update v1.py (PR #796)
Non ricevi spesso messaggi di posta elettronica da ***@***.*** Scopri perché è importante<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
ok, that's a valid idea but I cannot approve the change in a form as is - I believe it may not work (change of the run(...) method without altering manifest) and that's also a breaking change for the slicer block
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#796 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BM3UWP23BCS7ENC7XCGG6CL2AHJW5AVCNFSM6AAAAABRTUMWBKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINZQGE2TGOBUGY>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Il contenuto di questo messaggio e-mail e di ogni eventuale allegato è strettamente confidenziale e indirizzato esclusivamente al destinatario indicato. Tutte le informazioni contenute sono soggette ad obbligo di riservatezza ai sensi del Regolamento UE 2016/679 GDPR e del D.Lgs 196/2003 e sm. Il trattamento non autorizzato del contenuto trasmesso e/o allegato dal mittente è vietato. In caso di erronea ricezione il destinatario è pregato di contattare immediatamente il mittente e cancellare al più presto il messaggio. Grazie.
The contents and any attachments of this e-mail are strictly confidential and addressed exclusively to the designated addressee. Any information in this e-mail is subject to an obligation of confidentiality in accordance with EU regulation 2016/679 and D.Lgs. 196/2003. Unauthorized treatment of the content and/or any attachments of this e-mail is forbidden. In the event of incorrect reception the recipient must immediately contact the sender and delete as soon as possible the e-mail. Thank you.
Lutech Spa – P.IVA 02824320176 – Milano – REA-MI 1666842
|
I believe the proper way is to create the block in version My hunch now is to have a |
Another option is subclassing this block to get the behavior you want in a new block and using it as a custom block in your server. |
Multi-Slicer window
Description
Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed or implemented. Please also include relevant motivation and context (e.g. links, docs, tickets etc.).
List any dependencies that are required for this change.
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How has this change been tested, please provide a testcase or example of how you tested the change?
YOUR_ANSWER
Any specific deployment considerations
For example, documentation changes, usability, usage/costs, secrets, etc.
Docs