Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Will there be a jMonkeyEngine integration? #31

Open
Ali-RS opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Will there be a jMonkeyEngine integration? #31

Ali-RS opened this issue Oct 28, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Ali-RS
Copy link

Ali-RS commented Oct 28, 2019

Hi
Any plan for jMonkeyEngine support?

@Tom-Ski
Copy link
Member

Tom-Ski commented Oct 28, 2019

There are no immediate plans for us to make any other runtimes right now, apart from the LibGDX runtime, as we are using this in house. Anyone is very welcome and encouraged to write implementations for runtimes they want, or request for support for their platform. And I guess we can see where we can go from there.

Regarding jmonkey, you should be able to just use the libgdx runtime, and provide your own Renderer implementation.

@azakhary
Copy link
Collaborator

I was just thinking how can we make general runtime implementation easier (and combine this with how do we make java runtime performance - awesome)
Had this thought, I think we can actually traverse module graph and convert it into String of "C++" code per particle effect, if each module provides it's inline code. That way we can generate c++ library on the fly per effect. And then any other language that CAN use native C++ library, will be able to have a runtime with just several lines of code.
What do you think @Tom-Ski ? I can't seem to find any reason why this will not work.

@Tom-Ski Tom-Ski added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants