Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OFFSET & WIDTH constanst #583

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

OFFSET & WIDTH constanst #583

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

burrbull
Copy link
Member

Closes #582

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @reitermarkus

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-tools labels Mar 18, 2022
@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

would it make sense to actually give the offset in the documentation?

@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

burrbull commented Apr 4, 2022

would it make sense to actually give the offset in the documentation?

It is already there.
изображение
Or you mean something else?

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

I meant on the const, but it's as you showed already in the struct doc so it's fine 👍

@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

Close in favour of #598

@burrbull burrbull closed this Apr 29, 2022
@burrbull burrbull deleted the offsets branch July 27, 2022 05:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-decision S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-tools
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The ability to obtain offset values for the modifiable bit fields of registers
4 participants