You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As some of you may have seen in my comments on PR #858 I have been working on porting Scapegoat rules to Scalafix to make the linter compatible with Scala 3 but also with the future of Scala, with the use of Scalameta.
I have ported 52 rules for now, all were succesfully tested with unit tests and on a large codebase, with more coming.
Since some of you seemed interested in collaborating but things weren't moving, I figured I'd create an issue to discuss potential collaboration.
How do you want to go ahead?
Here are my thoughts: since I am using a completely different framework (Scalafix + Scalameta), it seems complicated to me to integrate directly into the Scapegoat code. The easiest solution would simply be to link to my repo, but I am not sure this is ideal, especially if you are planning more rules.
I'd be happy to hear your thoughts in the comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Scapegoat team and contributors!
As some of you may have seen in my comments on PR #858 I have been working on porting Scapegoat rules to Scalafix to make the linter compatible with Scala 3 but also with the future of Scala, with the use of Scalameta.
I have ported 52 rules for now, all were succesfully tested with unit tests and on a large codebase, with more coming.
Since some of you seemed interested in collaborating but things weren't moving, I figured I'd create an issue to discuss potential collaboration.
How do you want to go ahead?
Here are my thoughts: since I am using a completely different framework (Scalafix + Scalameta), it seems complicated to me to integrate directly into the Scapegoat code. The easiest solution would simply be to link to my repo, but I am not sure this is ideal, especially if you are planning more rules.
I'd be happy to hear your thoughts in the comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: