-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider adding blending to Cartesian planning #58
Comments
Hi @sea-bass, I learned the math in slides 6-13 from the resource you have shared above. I also understood the implementation of I have a few questions before attempting to implement blending:
|
I think there should be a maximum velocity magnitude As for how to parameterize, I think the best bet is to set a distance from the via point and then let the timing be dictated by max accelerations. This can be referred to as a "blending radius". But before all this... @eholum you said you were potentially looking at this same task? |
Not yet! I had started writing a Cartesian interpolator but I won't get back to it for at least 2 weeks. Happy to help review anything, though, @muhidabid. |
I thought nobody was looking into this issue. If you have started working on it @eholum, please continue! I was planning on working on it at a slow speed anyway since I have my university enrollment in a few days and I am preparing to travel. I will look into other issues no problem |
Instead of having to stop exactly at the intermediate points, there are common approaches to blending Cartesian paths.
This is one resource I like: https://www.diag.uniroma1.it/~deluca/rob1_en/14_TrajectoryPlanningCartesian.pdf
Whether just blending on position is enough, or we also need to find ways to do the same with rotation e.g., here remains TBD.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: