-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Seems [proxy_all] and [bypass_list} not working in custom ruls #2895
Comments
same here! |
Not supported. |
Such a shame! You may heard in the news, In my country (Iran) now internet is shutdown and only domestic network is working. Do not forget why this projects exist, what was their philosophy. For those like me that can't wait: you can do this
|
Discussed in #2894
Originally posted by iamsad3508 May 31, 2022
I want to bypass only 192.168.. with route set as ALL, but i know zero about rules, can anyone help?
Describe the bug
Seems [proxy_all] and [bypass_list} not working in custom ruls
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
SCENES 1
[proxy_all] [bypass_list] 192.168.0.0/16
SCENES 2
[proxy_all] [bypass_list] 192.168.0.0/16
Nothing show in the list and pop out a message : Fail to import
Seems including any of these(proxy_all and bypass_all) will fail to import
Expected behavior
SCENES 1 :all traffic including 127.0.0.1 go through SS, except 192.168.1.1
SCENES 2 :Import success
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
Configuration
Put an
x
inside the [ ] that applies.Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: