Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identical distractors #6

Open
Yeisoldt opened this issue May 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Identical distractors #6

Yeisoldt opened this issue May 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@Yeisoldt
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeisoldt commented May 8, 2019

For example multiple instances of „model“ as distractors in the same question. Perhaps taken out of bb and ob respectively. Consider switching to take information out of bb exclusively.

@KonradHoeffner KonradHoeffner added this to the 0.2 milestone Jun 11, 2019
@KonradHoeffner KonradHoeffner added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 11, 2019
@KonradHoeffner KonradHoeffner self-assigned this Jun 26, 2019
@KonradHoeffner
Copy link
Collaborator

There are multiple possible solutions:

  1. Using only bb in all SPARQL queries as @Yeisoldt suggests would work [1] if only using bb is ok.
  2. Remove those questions with at least two identical answers while initializing the program.
  3. Remove those questions from the data file.
  4. Filter out those questions in all the SPARQL queries.

[1] no results for:

select ?c1 ?c2 
from sniko:bb
{
owl:Class ^a ?c1,?c2.

filter(?c1!=?c2).
?c1 rdfs:label ?l1.
?c2 rdfs:label ?l2.
filter(str(?l1)=str(?l2))
}

@KonradHoeffner
Copy link
Collaborator

As @Yeisoldt suggests, I will restrict the SPARQL queries to bb (option 1) for now.

@KonradHoeffner KonradHoeffner modified the milestones: 0.2, 0.3 Jun 27, 2019
@KonradHoeffner KonradHoeffner modified the milestones: 22.05, later Aug 29, 2022
@KonradHoeffner KonradHoeffner removed their assignment Sep 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants