Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Performance test #5

Open
jomey opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Performance test #5

jomey opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@jomey
Copy link
Member

jomey commented May 22, 2024

Compare database performance between the old and new schema
@micah-prime
Copy link
Contributor

API reference
https://snowexsql.readthedocs.io/en/latest/gallery/api_intro_example.html
https://snowexsql.readthedocs.io/en/latest/gallery/api_plot_pit_density_example.html

micah-prime added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2024
@micah-prime
# This is a combination of 5 commits.
9879dd0 
# This is the 1st commit message:

add a query notebook that points at the copy of the points table

# This is the commit message #2:

add what the point data table linking could look like, including what adding an object might look like

# This is the commit message #3:

Example of how the realtionship might look

# This is the commit message #4:

attempt at having many-to-many with observers

# This is the commit message #5:

 assuming we don't need back populate on instrument relationships
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jomey @micah-prime