You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As shown above, effstim() calculated in Jy is not that far off compared to effstim() calculated in PHOTLAM and then converted to Jy around bandpass' pivot wavelength. However, that is not the case for PHOTNU. Why?
@deustua and @tddesjardins , since you have been looking into this from the INS side, what do you think? Is this a bug or am I not understanding something about effective stimulus in PHOTNU?
git blame shows that the Photnu.unitResponse() method used in the calculation in question was implemented by @vglaidler 11 years ago and has no changed since.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking at this more and referring to @deustua 's "first principle" formula that states effstim in PHOTLAM should be the same as effstim in FLAM converted to PHOTLAM along bandpass' pivot wavelength, I think PHOTLAM values might be problematic as well but at a smaller scale.
This does not make sense to me:
As shown above,
effstim()
calculated in Jy is not that far off compared toeffstim()
calculated in PHOTLAM and then converted to Jy around bandpass' pivot wavelength. However, that is not the case for PHOTNU. Why?@deustua and @tddesjardins , since you have been looking into this from the INS side, what do you think? Is this a bug or am I not understanding something about effective stimulus in PHOTNU?
git blame
shows that thePhotnu.unitResponse()
method used in the calculation in question was implemented by @vglaidler 11 years ago and has no changed since.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: