Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check if describetypejson is a better alternative to describetype #44

Open
benbenw opened this issue Oct 14, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Check if describetypejson is a better alternative to describetype #44

benbenw opened this issue Oct 14, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@benbenw
Copy link

benbenw commented Oct 14, 2013

When using swiz in a constrained environnement (aka mobile) the call to describetype is a major performance pb (cpu / memory allocated).
describetypejson seems to be a better alternative.

see also https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/swiz-framework/describetypejson/swiz-framework/h0QQIVu_t2o/ai8gqJ5Sn24J

describe

@benbenw
Copy link
Author

benbenw commented Oct 14, 2013

@Dretch
Copy link

Dretch commented Jan 22, 2015

This Is affecting me too.

I also noticed when profiling that BeanFactory does what looks like an unnecessary amount of array allocations via Array.concat, see: https://github.com/swiz/swiz-framework/blob/develop/src/org/swizframework/core/BeanFactory.as#L364

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants