Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Package]: sshx #22330

Open
8 tasks done
TomJo2000 opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
8 tasks done

[Package]: sshx #22330

TomJo2000 opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
package request A new package was requested

Comments

@TomJo2000
Copy link
Member

TomJo2000 commented Nov 19, 2024

Why is it worth to add this package?

Fast, collaborative live terminal sharing over the web

Home page URL

https://sshx.io/

Source code URL

https://github.com/ekzhang/sshx

Packaging policy acknowledgement

  • The project is actively developed.

  • The project has existing packages and is "well known".

  • Licensed under an open source license.

  • Not available through a language package manager: pip, npm, cpan, cargo, etc.

  • Not taking up too much disk space (< 100MiB per architecture, exceptions can be made)

  • Not duplicating the functionality of existing packages.

  • Not serving hacking, malware, phishing, spamming, spying, ddos functionality.

  • I certify that I have read Termux Packaging Policy and understand that my request will be denied if it is found lacking.

Additional information

Requested by @sleeping3119 in termux/termux-app.
Sorry for the mishap with the discussion, it looks like twaik accidentally hit delete instead of close on it.

This looks pretty doable in terms of tooling, no idea if it's going to need substantial patches though.

@TomJo2000 TomJo2000 added the package request A new package was requested label Nov 19, 2024
@twaik
Copy link
Member

twaik commented Nov 19, 2024

According to the log in ekzhang/sshx#102 sshx client tries to reach nscd's socket in the wrong (FHS compliant) place. Probably it will work after patching it.

@TomJo2000
Copy link
Member Author

Well that just sounds like standard FHS patching.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
package request A new package was requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants