You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have installed latest version(0.2.1), when asked if I want to use Coffeescript, I responded no. However, the generated Gruntfile, karma-unit* and package.json still contains references to Coffeescript.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are still some grunt-contrib references in the devDependencies of package.json, but these shouldn't impact your app in any way. Nothing gets added to your app payload if that's what you're worried about.
I'm not sure how much value it would add to prune these out of the generator because it would add some extra complexity to what is already a pretty difficult to read _Gruntfile.js - the file that transforms into your Gruntfile.js.
If you want to submit a pull request, I'd be happy to look at it.
Yes, it is harmless to the app. But value to the user is in the fact that people new to Grunt are already overwhelmed with how complex the Gruntfile looks, so any chance to make it smaller, would be good. From the template point of view, I understand your concern.
If I have the time, I will create a PR. Thanks for the feedback.
I have installed latest version(0.2.1), when asked if I want to use Coffeescript, I responded no. However, the generated Gruntfile, karma-unit* and package.json still contains references to Coffeescript.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: