We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The concordance function currently cannot be used to compare models when also using a strata term.
Reproducible example using the mgus2 data based on the example code for the concordance function comparing multiple models:
library(survival) # Filter mgus2 to complete data for simplicity tdat <- mgus2[complete.cases(mgus2),] # Fit two sex stratified models for comparison: fit4 <- coxph(Surv(ptime, pstat) ~ strata(sex) + age + mspike, tdat) fit5 <- coxph(Surv(ptime, pstat) ~ strata(sex) + age + hgb + creat, tdat) # Extract linear predictors p4 <- -predict(fit4) # invert; high risk scores predict shorter survival, equivalent to reverse=TRUE p5 <- -predict(fit5) # Compare condorance cfit <- concordance(Surv(ptime, pstat) ~ strata(sex) + p4 + p5, tdat)
This gives the following error message:
Error in dimnames(rval$count) <- list(Xname, cname) : length of 'dimnames' [1] not equal to array extent
Stepping through the concordance function, we can trace this error to the assembling of results in the concordancefit function on line 374 in the concordance.R file: https://github.com/therneau/survival/blob/master/R/concordance.R#L374
Here are the working states of rval and list(Xname, cname) right before the error:
rval
list(Xname, cname)
Browse[2]> rval $concordance p4 p5 <NA> <NA> 0.5146919 0.5000000 0.5256784 0.5000000 $count [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] 12913 11986 6649 7610 36 [2,] 6 6 0 0 2834173 [3,] 12490 10959 6362 7931 38 [4,] 6 6 0 0 2875235 $n [1] 1338
Browse[2]> list(Xname, cname) [[1]] [1] "p4" "p5" [[2]] [1] "concordant" "discordant" "tied.x" "tied.y" "tied.xy"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would do this in a much simpler way, i.e., concordance(fit4, fit5) I had not considered the setup you used, and will have to think about this a bit.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The concordance function currently cannot be used to compare models when also using a strata term.
Reproducible example using the mgus2 data based on the example code for the concordance function comparing multiple models:
This gives the following error message:
Stepping through the concordance function, we can trace this error to the assembling of results in the concordancefit function on line 374 in the concordance.R file: https://github.com/therneau/survival/blob/master/R/concordance.R#L374
Here are the working states of
rval
andlist(Xname, cname)
right before the error:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: