Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: T6859: include EULA files in build type definitions #833

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2024

Conversation

dmbaturin
Copy link
Member

Change Summary

Include EULA files in build type definitions so that they don't need to be added in a separate CI step.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • Migration from an old Vyatta component to vyos-1x, please link to related PR inside obsoleted component
  • Other (please describe): Internal change.

Related Task(s)

Component(s) name

Build configs.

Proposed changes

How to test

Images build with --build-type development and --build-type release should have the correct EULA in /usr/share/vyos/EULA.

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • I have linked this PR to one or more Phabricator Task(s)
  • My commit headlines contain a valid Task id
  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024


PR title does not match the required format

@dmbaturin dmbaturin force-pushed the T6859-eula-files branch 2 times, most recently from 75fec83 to 9617417 Compare November 8, 2024 12:44
data/build-types/release.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@c-po
Copy link
Member

c-po commented Nov 20, 2024

After comiting the suggestion this one should be squashed and merged

@c-po c-po merged commit 029cd72 into vyos:current Nov 30, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants