Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regarding issue #282 Add stylistic alternate for 19th century F clef #293

Open
MrFuzzywump opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@MrFuzzywump
Copy link

MrFuzzywump commented Sep 21, 2024

          @MrFuzzywump -- it has been requested several times that you not continue to add more examples of these well known stylistic alternates to this issue.  Locking for now.  Any owner can unlock.

Originally posted by @mscuthbert in #282 (comment)

I will not continue to add more examples of these well known stylistic alternates to this issue and I am not continuing to add more examples of these well known stylistic alternates to this issue. How to unlock? Who will unlock? Would you be willing to unlock?

And I have just created a new name for this new glyph: F clef, turned C shape. What do you think?

@MrFuzzywump
Copy link
Author

I don't need to post more examples.

@MrFuzzywump
Copy link
Author

MrFuzzywump commented Sep 21, 2024

I was posting some 18th century examples because the issue has "19th century" in it. It was used mostly, if not only, before 1840. The "Before 1840 F clef" was used before 1840, hence the name, and in the 18th century. And we have disagreement on whether it's 18th century or 19th century. I would call it simply earlyModernFClef since we have disagreement on whether it's 18th century or 19th century and that term mostly covers either. The oldest example I sent was 1784. I just wanted to prove that it was (also) used in the 18th century. I would call it simply F clef, turned C shape.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant