See this page for a guide and format to issue reports.
Hello and welcome to /tg/station's contributing page. You are here because you are curious or interested in contributing. Thanks for being interested. Everyone is free to contribute to this project as long as they follow the simple guidelines and specifications below, because at /tg/station, we have a goal to increase code maintainability and to do that we are going to need all pull requests to hold up to those specifications. This is in order for all of us to benefit, instead of having to fix the same bug more than once because of duplicated code.
But first we want to make it clear how you can contribute, if contributing is a new experience for you, and what powers the team has over your pull request so you do not get any surprises when submitting pull requests, and it is closed for a reason you did not anticipate.
At /tg/station we do not have a list of goals and features to add, we instead allow freedom for contributors to suggest and create their ideas for the game. That does not mean we aren't determined to squash bugs, which unfortunately pop up a lot due to the deep complexity of the game. Here are some useful getting started guides, if you want to contribute or if you want to know what challenges you can tackle with zero knowledge about the game's code structure.
If you want to contribute the first thing you'll need to do is set up Git so you can download the source code.
We have a list of guides on the wiki which will help you get started contributing to /tg/station with git and Dream Maker. For beginners, it is recommended you work on small projects, at first. If you need help learning to program in BYOND check out this repository of resources.
There is an open list of approachable issues for your inspiration here.
You can of course, as always, ask for help at #coderbus on irc.rizon.net. We are just here to have fun and help so do not expect professional support please.
Project Leads
Project Leads, which are elected by the maintainers and members of the project, have complete control over what goes through and what is reverted. They are encouraged to take control in what features are added to the game. Project Leads can also act as Project Managers when needed.
Project Managers
Project Managers are responsible for recruiting and firing maintainers, enforcing coding standards, and reverting changes that should have not been committed. Project Managers are assigned by Project Leads. On things that Project Managers disagree on they are to refer to the Project Leads for advice. It is encouraged that if you do not want to waste time working on a feature, that might be denied, that you ask a Project Manager first.
Maintainers
Maintainers are quality control. If a proposed pull request does not meet the mentioned quality specifications then it can be closed if you fail to satisfy them. Maintainers are required to give a reason for closing the pull request.
Maintainers can revert your changes if they feel they are not worth maintaining or if they did not live up to the quality specifications.
As mentioned before, you are expected to follow these specifications in order to make everyone's lives easier, it will also save you and us time, with having to make the changes and us having to tell you what to change. Thank you for reading this section.
As BYOND's Dream Maker is an object oriented language, code must be object oriented when possible in order to be more flexible when adding content to it. If you are unfamiliar with this concept, it is highly recommended you look it up.
(ie: absolute pathing)
Byond will allow you nest almost any type keyword into a block, such as:
datum
datum1
var
varname1 = 1
varname2
static
varname3
varname4
proc
proc1()
code
proc2()
code
datum2
varname1 = 0
proc
proc3()
code
proc2()
..()
code
The use of this is not allowed in this project as it makes finding definitions via full text searching next to impossible. The only exception is the variables of an object may be nested to the object, but must not nest further.
The previous code made compliant:
/datum/datum1
var/varname1
var/varname2
var/static/varname3
var/static/varname4
/datum/datum1/proc/proc1()
code
/datum/datum1/proc/proc2()
code
/datum/datum1/datum2
varname1 = 0
/datum/datum1/datum2/proc/proc3()
code
/datum/datum1/datum2/proc2()
..()
code
The use of the : operator to override type safety checks is not allowed. You must cast the variable to the proper type.
eg: /datum/thing
not datum/thing
In byond this is optional, but omitting it makes finding definitions harder.
It is rarely allowed to put type paths in a text format, as there are no compile errors if the type path no longer exists. Here is an example:
//Good
var/path_type = /obj/item/weapon/baseball_bat
//Bad
var/path_type = "/obj/item/weapon/baseball_bat"
You must use tabs to indent your code, NOT SPACES.
(You may use spaces to align something, but you should tab to the block level first, then add the remaining spaces)
Hacky code, such as adding specific checks, is highly discouraged and only allowed when there is no other option. (Protip: 'I couldn't immediately think of a proper way so thus there must be no other option' is not gonna cut it here )
You can avoid hacky code by using object oriented methodologies, such as overriding a function (called procs in DM) or sectioning code into functions and then overriding them as required.
Copying code from one place to another maybe suitable for small short time projects but /tg/station focuses on the long term and thus discourages this.
Instead you can use object orientation, or simply placing repeated code in a function, to obey this specification easily.
Startup/Runtime tradeoffs with lists and the "hidden" init proc
First, read the comments in this byond thread, starting here:http://www.byond.com/forum/?post=2086980&page=2#comment19776775
There are two key points here:
- Defining a list in the type definition incurs a hidden proc call - init, if you must define a list at startup, do so in New() and avoid the overhead of a second call (init() and then new())
2)Offsets list creation overhead to the point where the list is actually required (which for many objects, may be never at all).
Remember, this tradeoff makes sense in many cases but not all, you should think carefully about your implementation before deciding if this is an appropriate thing to do
Make these #defines with a name that more clearly states what it's for.
(if,while,for,etc)
- All control statements must not contain code on the same line as the statement (
if (blah) return
) - All control statements comparing a variable to a number should use the formula of
thing
operator
number
, not the reverse (eg:if (count <= 10)
notif (10 >= count)
)
Do not enclose a proc in an if block when returning on a condition is more feasible This is bad:
/datum/datum1/proc/proc1()
if (thing1)
if (!thing2)
if (thing3 == 30)
do stuff
This is good:
/datum/datum1/proc/proc1()
if (!thing1)
return
if (thing2)
return
if (thing3 != 30)
return
do stuff
This prevents nesting levels from getting deeper then they need to be.
-
Player input must always be escaped safely, we recommend you use stripped_input in all cases where you would use input. Essentially, just always treat input from players as inherently malicious and design with that use case in mind
-
Calls to the database must be escaped properly - use sanitizeSQL to escape text based database entries from players or admins, and isnum() for number based database entries from players or admins.
-
All calls to topics must be checked for correctness, topic href calls can be easily faked by clients, so you should ensure that the call is valid for the state the item is in. Do not rely on the UI code to provide only valid topic calls
-
Information that players could use to metagame (that is to identify the round type and or the antags via information that would not be available to them in character) should be kept as administrator only
-
It is recommended as well you do not expose information about the players - even something as simple as the number of people who have readied up at the start of the round can and has been used to try to identify the round type
-
Where you have code that can cause large scale modification and FUN make sure you start it out locked behind one of the default admin roles - use common sense to determine which role fits the level of damage a function could do
-
Code should be modular where possible, if you are working on a new class then it is best if you put it in a new file.
-
Bloated code may be necessary to add a certain feature, which means there has to be a judgement over whether the feature is worth having or not. You can help make this decision easier by making sure your code is modular.
-
You are expected to help maintain the code that you add, meaning if there is a problem then you are likely to be approached in order to fix any issues, runtimes or bugs.
-
Do not divide when you can easily convert it to a multiplication. (ie
4/2
should be done as4*0.5
)
The following different coding styles are not only not enforced, but it is generally frowned upon to change them over from one to the other for little reason:
- English/British spelling on var/proc names
- Color/Colour nobody cares,
- Spaces after control statements
- if() if () nobody cares.
(this is not strictly enforced, but more a guideline for readability's sake)
- Operators that should be separated by spaces
- Boolean and logic operators like &&, || <, >, ==, etc (but not !)
- Argument separator operators like , (and ; when used in a forloop)
- Assignment operators like = or += or the like
- Operators that should not be separated by spaces
- Bitwise operators like & or |
- Access operators like . and :
- Parentheses ()
- logical not !
Math operators like +, -, /, *, etc are up in the air, just choose which version looks more readable.
Like all languages, Dream Maker has its quirks, some of them are beneficial to us, like these
-
In-To for loops:
for(var/i = 1, i <= some_value, i++)
is a fairly standard way to write an incremental for loop in most languages (especially those in the C family) however DM'sfor(var/i in 1 to some_value)
syntax is oddly faster than its implementation of the former syntax; where possible it's advised to use DM's syntax. (Note, theto
keyword is inclusive, so it automatically defaults to replacing<=
, if you want<
then you should write it as1 to some_value-1
). HOWEVER, if eithersome_value
ori
changes within the body of the for (underneath thefor(...)
header) or if you are looping over a list AND changing the length of the list then you can NOT use this type of for loop! -
Istypeless for loops: a name for a differing syntax for writing for-each style loops in DM, however it is NOT DM's standard syntax hence why this is considered a quirk. Take a look at this:
var/list/bag_of_items = list(sword, apple, coinpouch, sword, sword)
var/obj/item/sword/best_sword = null
for(var/obj/item/sword/S in bag_of_items)
if(!best_sword || S.damage > best_sword.damage)
best_sword = S
The above is a simple proc for checking all swords in a container and returning the one with the highest damage, it uses DM's standard syntax for a for loop, it does this by specifying a type in the variable of the for header which byond interprets as a type to filter by, it performs this filter using istype()
(or some internal-magic similar to istype()
, I wouldn't put it past byond), the above example is fine with the data currently contained in bag_of_items
, however if bag_of_items
contained ONLY swords, or only SUBTYPES of swords, then the above is inefficient, for example:
var/list/bag_of_swords = list(sword, sword, sword, sword)
var/obj/item/sword/best_sword = null
for(var/obj/item/sword/S in bag_of_swords)
if(!best_sword || S.damage > best_sword.damage)
best_sword = S
specifies a type for DM to filter by, with the previous example that's perfectly fine, we only want swords, but here the bag only contains swords? is DM still going to try to filter because we gave it a type to filter by? YES, and here comes the inefficiency. Whereever a list (or other container, such as an atom (in which case you're technically accessing their special contents list but I digress)) contains datums of the same datatype or subtypes of the datatype you require for your for body
you can circumvent DM's filtering and automatic istype()
checks by writing the loop as such:
var/list/bag_of_swords = list(sword, sword, sword, sword)
var/obj/item/sword/best_sword = null
for(var/s in bag_of_swords)
var/obj/item/sword/S = s
if(!best_sword || S.damage > best_sword.damage)
best_sword = S
Of course, if the list contains data of a mixed type then the above optimisation is DANGEROUS, as it will blindly typecast all data in the list as the specified type, even if it isn't really that type! which will cause runtime errors.
- Dot variable: like other languages in the C family, Dream maker has a
.
or "Dot" operator, used for accessing variables/members/functions of an object instance. eg:
var/mob/living/carbon/human/H = YOU_THE_READER
H.gib()
however DM also has a dot variable, accessed just as .
on it's own, defaulting to a value of null, now what's special about the dot operator is that it is automatically returned (as in the return
statment) at the end of a proc, provided the proc does not already manually return (return count
for example). Why is this special? well the return
statement should ideally be free from overhead (functionally free, of course nothing's free) but DM fails to fulfill this, DM's return statement is actually fairly costly for what it does and for what it's used for.
With .
being everpresent in every proc can we use it as a temporary variable? Of course we can! However the .
operator cannot replace a typecasted variable, it can hold data any other var in DM can, it just can't be accessed as one, however the .
operator is compatible with a few operators that look weird but work perfectly fine, such as: .++
for incrementing .'s
value, or .[1]
for accessing the first element of .
(provided it's a list).
There is no strict process when it comes to merging pull requests, pull requests will sometimes take a while before they are looked at by a maintainer, the bigger the change the more time it will take before they are accepted into the code. Every team member is a volunteer who is giving up their own time to help maintain and contribute, so please be nice. Here are some helpful ways to make it easier for you and for the maintainer when making a pull request.
-
Make sure your pull request complies to the requirements outlined in this guide
-
You are going to be expected to document all your changes in the pull request, failing to do so will mean delaying it as we will have to question why you made the change. On the other hand you can speed up the process by making the pull request readable and easy to understand, with diagrams or before/after data.
-
We ask that you use the changelog system to document your change, this prevents our players from being caught unaware by changes - you can find more information about this here http://tgstation13.org/wiki/Guide_to_Changelogs
-
If you are proposing multiple changes, which change many different aspects of the code, you are expected to section them off into different pull requests in order to make it easier to review them and to deny/accept the changes that are deemed acceptable.
-
If your pull request is accepted, the code you add no longer belongs exclusively to you but to everyone; everyone is free to work on it, but you are also free to object to any changes being made, which will be noted by a Project Lead or Project Manager. It is a shame this has to be explicitly said, but there have been cases where this would've saved some trouble.
Do not add any of the following in a Pull Request or risk getting the PR closed:
- National Socialist Party of Germany content, National Socialist Party of Germany related content, or National Socialist Party of Germany references
Yes we know that the files have a tonne of mixed windows and linux line endings, attempts to fix this have been met with less than stellar success and as such we have decided to give up caring until such a time as it matters.
Therefore EOF settings of main repo are forbidden territory one must avoid wandering into