Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PM] Add the ability to flag invalid markets #228

Open
lsaether opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

[PM] Add the ability to flag invalid markets #228

lsaether opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
p:low Low priority, resolution of this issue can wait t:enhancement The issue described an enhancement

Comments

@lsaether
Copy link
Member

Users should be able to flag markets that were created permissionlessly. Flagging requires a small ZTG bond, and puts the market into a queue. The markets with the most flags move to the top of the queue, and their validity can be decided on by the Advisory Committee. If the market is decided to be invalid, then all flagging users get their deposits back and the original market creator forfeits their ValidityBond to the treasury.

@lsaether lsaether added p:medium Medium priority, this issue can wait but should be done fairly soon t:enhancement The issue described an enhancement labels Jul 13, 2021
@sea212
Copy link
Member

sea212 commented Jul 27, 2021

I think it would be nice to reward those who flag markets correctly and risk reducing their ZTG bond. Maybe we can use part of the ValidityBond to reward those who flagged it and the other part goes into the treasury.

@sea212
Copy link
Member

sea212 commented Jul 13, 2022

We also have to define precisely and transparently and communicate which properties render a market as "invalid"

@maltekliemann maltekliemann added p:low Low priority, resolution of this issue can wait t:enhancement The issue described an enhancement and removed p:medium Medium priority, this issue can wait but should be done fairly soon t:enhancement The issue described an enhancement labels May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
p:low Low priority, resolution of this issue can wait t:enhancement The issue described an enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants