feat: avm/res/compute/gallery: Added UDT applicationsType

[johnlokerse]

Description

This PR adds the applicationsType UDT and updates existing UDTs to follow AVM standards.

Tagging owner: @ReneHezser

Pipeline Reference

Pipeline

Type of Change

• Update to CI Environment or utilities (Non-module affecting changes)
• Azure Verified Module updates:
  • Bugfix containing backwards-compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in version.json:
    • Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes #{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
    • The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an issue to report it yet.
  • Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have bumped the MINOR version in version.json.
  • Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in version.json.
  • Update to documentation

Checklist

• I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
• I have run Set-AVMModule locally to generate the supporting module files.
• My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without any errors or warnings

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

Important

The "Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed once the triage process is complete!

Tip

For additional guidance on how to triage this issue/PR, see the BRM Issue Triage documentation.

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

Important

If this is a module-related PR, being submitted by the sole owner of the module, the AVM core team must review and approve it (as module owners can't approve their own PRs).

To indicate this PR needs the core team''s attention, apply the "Needs: Core Team 🧞" label!

The core team will only review and approve PRs that have this label applied!

[ReneHezser]

Thank you for your contribution. I added some small comments.

[johnlokerse]

Thank you for your contribution. I added some small comments.

Thanks! Implemented the comments. Could you re-check it to see if it's as expected?

[ReneHezser]

Thanks again for your contribution.

For next time, please do not solve conversations. Usually, the reviewer does that after checking again. This makes it easier for us to do the reviews on many modules at the same time.

[AlexanderSehr]

Hey @ReneHezser, I'll leave the final approval to you as you reviewed the PR initially :)

[johnlokerse]

@ReneHezser Let me know if I have to do something 😃

[ReneHezser]

Thanks again for the contribution.

[ReneHezser]

@johnlokerse You can merge the PR now. Thanks for your patience.

[johnlokerse]

@AlexanderSehr or @ReneHezser Can you merge it for me? I am just a contributor ;-)

[AlexanderSehr]

Say no more @johnlokerse