Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: bump commonlib and version #123

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

chore: bump commonlib and version #123

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024
+3 −3

Conversation

rvazarkar
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Updates to v2.5.9 and bumps commonlib to v4.0.9

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

No tests required

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Chore (a change that does not modify the application functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Documentation updates are needed, and have been made accordingly.
  • I have added and/or updated tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • My changes include a database migration.

zinic
zinic approved these changes Dec 2, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@zinic zinic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm - pull!

@rvazarkar rvazarkar merged commit 64ef0e5 into 2.X Dec 2, 2024
1 check passed
@rvazarkar rvazarkar deleted the update_version branch December 2, 2024 19:25
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@zinic zinic zinic approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rvazarkar @zinic