Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for GetConsensusDetailedStatus. #324

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Support for GetConsensusDetailedStatus. #324

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

td202
Copy link
Contributor

@td202 td202 commented Oct 22, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Purpose

Support the GetConsensusDetailedStatus query.

Changes

  • Add new command consensus detailed-status.
  • Add new raw command raw GetConsensusDetailedStatus.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style of this project.
  • The code compiles without warnings.
  • I have performed a self-review of the changes.
  • I have documented my code, in particular the intent of the
    hard-to-understand areas.
  • (If necessary) I have updated the CHANGELOG.

@td202 td202 requested review from drsk0 and eb-concordium October 22, 2024 13:22
drsk0
drsk0 approved these changes Oct 22, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@drsk0 drsk0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@td202 td202 merged commit 4e58082 into main Oct 31, 2024
2 checks passed
@td202 td202 deleted the consensus-detailed-status branch October 31, 2024 15:59
@td202 td202 mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2024
Closed
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@drsk0 drsk0 drsk0 approved these changes

@eb-concordium eb-concordium Awaiting requested review from eb-concordium

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@td202 @drsk0