-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DRAFT] Ndmii 3190 ha agent e2e keep #31682
Conversation
Gitlab CI Configuration ChangesAdded Jobs.on_ha_agent_or_e2e_changes.on_ha_agent_or_e2e_changes:
- if: $RUN_E2E_TESTS == "off"
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- if: $RUN_E2E_TESTS == "on"
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_TAG =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+-rc\.[0-9]+$/
when: on_success
- changes:
compare_to: main
paths:
- .gitlab/e2e/e2e.yml
- test/new-e2e/pkg/**/*
- test/new-e2e/go.mod
- flakes.yaml
- changes:
compare_to: main
paths:
- comp/netflow/**/*
- test/new-e2e/tests/ha-agent/**/*
- test/new-e2e/go.mod
when: on_success new-e2e-ha-agentnew-e2e-ha-agent:
after_script:
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/junit_upload.sh
artifacts:
expire_in: 2 weeks
paths:
- $E2E_OUTPUT_DIR
- junit-*.tgz
reports:
annotations:
- $EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH
when: always
before_script:
- mkdir -p $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache && tar xJf modcache_e2e.tar.xz -C $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache
- rm -f modcache_e2e.tar.xz
- mkdir -p ~/.aws
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E profile >> ~/.aws/config
|| exit $?
- export AWS_PROFILE=agent-qa-ci
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_public_key_rsa > $E2E_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- touch $E2E_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && chmod 600 $E2E_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh
$AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_key_rsa > $E2E_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH || exit $?
- pulumi login "s3://dd-pulumi-state?region=us-east-1&awssdk=v2&profile=$AWS_PROFILE"
- ARM_CLIENT_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE client_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_CLIENT_ID
- ARM_CLIENT_SECRET=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE token)
|| exit $?; export ARM_CLIENT_SECRET
- ARM_TENANT_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE tenant_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_TENANT_ID
- ARM_SUBSCRIPTION_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE subscription_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_SUBSCRIPTION_ID
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_GCP credentials_json > ~/gcp-credentials.json
|| exit $?
- export GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS=~/gcp-credentials.json
- inv -e gitlab.generate-ci-visibility-links --output=$EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH
image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/test-infra-definitions/runner$TEST_INFRA_DEFINITIONS_BUILDIMAGES_SUFFIX:$TEST_INFRA_DEFINITIONS_BUILDIMAGES
needs:
- go_e2e_deps
- qa_agent
rules:
- if: $RUN_E2E_TESTS == "off"
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- if: $RUN_E2E_TESTS == "on"
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_TAG =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+-rc\.[0-9]+$/
when: on_success
- changes:
compare_to: main
paths:
- .gitlab/e2e/e2e.yml
- test/new-e2e/pkg/**/*
- test/new-e2e/go.mod
- flakes.yaml
- changes:
compare_to: main
paths:
- comp/netflow/**/*
- test/new-e2e/tests/ndm/netflow/**/*
- test/new-e2e/go.mod
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- allow_failure: true
when: manual
script:
- inv -e new-e2e-tests.run --targets $TARGETS -c ddagent:imagePullRegistry=669783387624.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
-c ddagent:imagePullUsername=AWS -c ddagent:imagePullPassword=$(aws ecr get-login-password)
--junit-tar junit-${CI_JOB_ID}.tgz ${EXTRA_PARAMS} --test-washer
stage: e2e
tags:
- arch:amd64
variables:
E2E_COMMIT_SHA: $CI_COMMIT_SHORT_SHA
E2E_KEY_PAIR_NAME: datadog-agent-ci-rsa
E2E_OUTPUT_DIR: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/e2e-output
E2E_PIPELINE_ID: $CI_PIPELINE_ID
E2E_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-ssh-key
E2E_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-ssh-key.pub
EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH: external_links_$CI_JOB_ID.json
KUBERNETES_CPU_REQUEST: 6
KUBERNETES_MEMORY_LIMIT: 16Gi
KUBERNETES_MEMORY_REQUEST: 12Gi
SHOULD_RUN_IN_FLAKES_FINDER: 'true'
TARGETS: ./tests/ha-agent
TEAM: ndm-core Changes Summary
ℹ️ Diff available in the job log. |
[Fast Unit Tests Report] On pipeline 50235985 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests: Jobs:
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help |
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=50235985 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit 6d615c5 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 0e9db52 Optimization Goals: ❌ Significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | +7.22 | [+3.01, +11.43] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +2.46 | [+2.32, +2.59] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.49 | [+0.44, +0.54] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.62, +0.63] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.72, +0.73] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.02, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.10, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.47, +0.45] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.84, +0.81] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.81, +0.73] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.29 | [-1.07, +0.50] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.81 | [-1.55, -0.08] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -1.13 | [-4.12, +1.86] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -1.31 | [-1.38, -1.24] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -1.43 | [-1.57, -1.29] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -1.67 | [-2.34, -1.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | -4.94 | [-8.57, -1.31] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 8/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
❌ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 9/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
❌ Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 9/10 replicas passed. Failed 1 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 8/10 replicas passed. Failed 2 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
No description provided.