Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NPM-3662] Add sestatus to agent flare #32068

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pimlu
Copy link
Contributor

@pimlu pimlu commented Dec 11, 2024

What does this PR do?

This probe writes the output of sestatus to system-probe/selinux_sestatus.log.

This PR is a rebase of #31088 on top of Bryce's SystemProbeUtil refactors.

Motivation

Various distros ship selinux by default and this is useful for support on customers deploying selinux.

Describe how you validated your changes

Run a flare and check system-probe/selinux_sestatus.log

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: 367c4b6
Comparison: 6aea6fc

binaryosarchchange
system-probelinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/system-probe/api/debug
system-probelinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/system-probe/api/debug
system-probewindowsamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/system-probe/api/debug

@pimlu
Copy link
Contributor Author

pimlu commented Dec 11, 2024

Will need to fix those integration tests

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=50902898 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 6aea6fc

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 367c4b6154a709751eac1c92b7d0b0957aa83511

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 1265.84MB 1265.83MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB ⚠️ 113.27MB 113.26MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.41MB 78.41MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 526.60MB 526.60MB 70.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 1275.07MB 1275.06MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.01MB ⚠️ 1275.07MB 1275.06MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB ⚠️ 113.34MB 113.33MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB ⚠️ 113.34MB 113.33MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.49MB 78.49MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.49MB 78.49MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 1000.83MB 1000.83MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.75MB 108.75MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.64MB 55.64MB 10.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB ⚠️ 1010.04MB 1010.04MB 140.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB ⚠️ 108.82MB 108.82MB 10.00MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@pimlu pimlu added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Dec 11, 2024
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: dc2ddae2-95d8-4bae-a95c-05473c270ea3

Baseline: 367c4b6
Comparison: 6aea6fc
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +1.48 [+1.35, +1.60] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.79 [+0.72, +0.86] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.66 [-2.29, +3.61] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.25 [-0.54, +1.04] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.16 [+0.11, +0.21] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.04 [-0.85, +0.93] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.04 [-0.43, +0.51] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.76, +0.78] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.08, +0.10] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.01 [-0.74, +0.71] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.65, +0.61] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.03 [-0.86, +0.80] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.76, +0.67] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.14 [-0.97, +0.70] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.19 [-0.31, -0.06] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.30 [-0.97, +0.37] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/system-probe medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/ebpf-platform
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant