Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs: improve cookbook/transaction-request #3440

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

docs: improve cookbook/transaction-request #3440

wants to merge 6 commits into from
+205 −74

Conversation

Torres-ssf
Copy link
Contributor

@Torres-ssf Torres-ssf commented Dec 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Summary

This PR introduces improvements to the transaction request cookbook documentation.

Checklist

  • All changes are covered by tests (or not applicable)
  • All changes are documented (or not applicable)
  • I reviewed the entire PR myself (preferably, on GH UI)
  • I described all Breaking Changes (or there's none)

@Torres-ssf Torres-ssf added the docs Requests pertinent to documentation label Dec 2, 2024
@Torres-ssf Torres-ssf self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
fuels-template 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Dec 2, 2024 2:51pm
ts-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 2, 2024 2:51pm
ts-docs-api ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 2, 2024 2:51pm

@codspeed-hq CodSpeed HQ
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 2, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3440 will not alter performance

Comparing st/docs/improvements-tx-request (624393a) with master (283a684)

Summary

✅ 18 untouched benchmarks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@digorithm digorithm Awaiting requested review from digorithm digorithm will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review digorithm is a code owner

@arboleya arboleya Awaiting requested review from arboleya arboleya will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review arboleya is a code owner

@Dhaiwat10 Dhaiwat10 Awaiting requested review from Dhaiwat10 Dhaiwat10 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review Dhaiwat10 is a code owner

@danielbate danielbate Awaiting requested review from danielbate danielbate will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review danielbate is a code owner

@nedsalk nedsalk Awaiting requested review from nedsalk nedsalk will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review nedsalk is a code owner

@petertonysmith94 petertonysmith94 Awaiting requested review from petertonysmith94 petertonysmith94 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review petertonysmith94 is a code owner

@maschad maschad Awaiting requested review from maschad maschad will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review maschad is a code owner

At least 3 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@Torres-ssf Torres-ssf

Labels
docs Requests pertinent to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@Torres-ssf