Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

profile throughput without new threads #2826

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

grimoire
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. The following instructions would make your pull request more healthy and more easily receiving feedbacks. If you do not understand some items, don't worry, just make the pull request and seek help from maintainers.

Motivation

Please describe the motivation of this PR and the goal you want to achieve through this PR.

Modification

Please briefly describe what modification is made in this PR.

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward-compatibility of the downstream repositories?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.

Checklist

  1. Pre-commit or other linting tools are used to fix the potential lint issues.
  2. The modification is covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit tests to ensure the correctness.
  3. If the modification has a dependency on downstream projects of a newer version, this PR should be tested with all supported versions of downstream projects.
  4. The documentation has been modified accordingly, like docstring or example tutorials.

@lvhan028 lvhan028 self-requested a review November 29, 2024 04:58
@@ -742,8 +688,9 @@ async def async_forward(self, inputs: ModelInputs, swap_in_map: SwapMap,
output = self._forward_impl(inputs,
swap_in_map=swap_in_map,
swap_out_map=swap_out_map)
await asyncio.get_event_loop().run_in_executor(None,
self.stream.synchronize)
await asyncio.sleep(0)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How does this method outperform the previous one?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

asyncio.sleep release CPU without creating new thread

@@ -741,6 +748,8 @@ def __update_inputs(next_token_ids):
logger.debug('<ForwardTask>: '
f'batch_size={inputs.seq_length.size(0)} '
f'num_tokens={inputs.input_ids.size(-1)}')
if self.gpu_count == 1:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need this while previously not?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

logits process can be streaming with cuda inputs.
distribute container with cuda tensor is slower than CPU tensor.

@@ -60,8 +34,8 @@ def apply_rotary_pos_emb_qk_kernel(
BLOCK_N: tl.constexpr,
):
"""apply rotary on key AND query kernel."""
seq_block_id = tl.program_id(0)
head_id = tl.program_id(1)
seq_block_id = tl.program_id(1)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the benefit of this change?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

increate cos/sin cache hit rate.

@@ -79,7 +47,7 @@ def _fill_kv_cache_kernel(
QSeqLens,
KVSeqLens,
BlockOffsets,
num_heads: tl.constexpr,
is_decoding: tl.constexpr,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it mean that the quant kernel of fill_kv_cache can also be optimized?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

quant kernel would be optimized in future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants