-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decay Function Improvements #185
Decay Function Improvements #185
Conversation
hi @BrandonGarciaWx , thanks for raising this PR. I'll review it in the following days. In the meanwhile, can you point out a reference to justify that the hypotenuse of the map is a good initial value for sigma? |
Thank you for the comments, I believe I have addressed them all. I also made some additional minor changes to some decay function descriptions and names. My justification for the hypotenuse of the SOM being a good initial value for sigma comes from the following paper:
I know the lead author personally and confirmed that "diameter" and "hypotenuse" mean the same thing in this context. The citation for Kohonen (2001) is
|
In addition to removing the text about custom decay functions, I added a function for sigma to linearly decrease to one. |
See my comment here: https://github.com/JustGlowing/minisom/pull/185/files#r1572485322 |
Decay functions have been moved and function descriptions have been updated. |
Thanks for your contribution @BrandonGarciaWx ! |
These changes were previously discussed in #184