feat: improve building IWD and IPak obj containers #286
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously
Currently building IPaks is pretty annoying and building IWDs is not implemented yet.
Previously OBJ containers had to be built as seperate targets.
If they were supposed to include obj data for assets from the built zone they had to include an assetlist which have not been generated automatically and have a fully defined zone file.
Now
This PR tries to unify the building process of fastfile and additional obj containers into a single target.
This aims to improve building of IPaks, IWDs and in the future soundbanks.
This is supposed to result in a built
mod.ff
,mymoddedipakname.ipak
andmymoddediwdname.iwd
.The IPak and IWD contain all supported obj data of the assets that follow.
You can switch to another IWD or IPak by redefining
>ipak,newipak
or>iwd,newiwd
respectively.This will cause all following obj data to go into a new obj container.
This way you can split data.
Specifying the respective metadata key with an empty value
>ipak,
or>iwd,
then you can stop writing data to this obj container.Closes: #27