-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update operational workflow to work with GSI develop branch #3068
base: release/gfs.v16.4
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update operational workflow to work with GSI develop branch #3068
Conversation
…bal-workflow into dev/gfs.v16.GSIdev
…bal-workflow into dev/gfs.v16.GSIdev
@ADCollard I see that most file changes are due to the changes in the .gitignore.
|
@emilyhcliu Yes, the idea is that this is a v16 workflow that will checkout the develop version of GSI (eventually it will be a specific tag). I am mostly looking for feedback on whether this is the right way to do this. I have also started a real time parallel on WCOSS2 (this will only run on WCOSS2), but right now the machine is unavailable, so it might be easiest just to look at those results. Yes, the CRTM version is 2.4.0.1 which is the current operational version. I don't think we have time to move to CRTM v3.0 for GFSv16.4, but that would be addressed via a different issue anyway. Thanks for looking at this! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can't bring in most v17 script updates and need to stick closer to the v16 versions for this update. Please see my comments and let me know if I can assist at all. Thanks @ADCollard !
scripts/exgdas_atmos_verfozn.sh
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ | |||
#! /usr/bin/env bash | |||
|
|||
source "$HOMEgfs/ush/preamble.sh" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment as above. Can't use preamble but thankfully it looks like this script hasn't changed much between v16 and v17 so you can likely keep most of the v17 version:
[kfriedma@hercules-login-2 scripts]$ pwd
/work/noaa/global/kfriedma/git_hercules/dev-gfs.v16.GSIdev/scripts
[kfriedma@hercules-login-2 scripts]$ diff ../../release-gfs.v16.3.21/scripts/exgdas_atmos_verfozn.sh exgdas_atmos_verfozn.sh
1c1
< #/bin/sh
---
> #! /usr/bin/env bash
3c3
< set -ax
---
> source "$HOMEgfs/ush/preamble.sh"
12,13d11
< export scr=exgdas_vrfyozn.sh
<
73c71
< count=`ls diag* | grep ".nc4" | wc -l`
---
> count=$(ls diag* | grep ".nc4" | wc -l)
76,77c74,75
< for filenc4 in `ls diag*nc4.gz`; do
< file=`echo $filenc4 | cut -d'.' -f1-2`.gz
---
> for filenc4 in $(ls diag*nc4.gz); do
> file=$(echo $filenc4 | cut -d'.' -f1-2).gz
92,98d89
<
< if [[ "$VERBOSE" = "YES" ]]; then
< echo "end exgdas_vrfyozn.sh, exit value = ${err}"
< fi
<
<
< set +x
#----------------------------------- | ||
#--add gfs_wafs link if checked out | ||
if [ -d ${pwd}/gfs_wafs.fd ]; then | ||
#----------------------------------- | ||
cd ${pwd}/../jobs ||exit 8 | ||
$LINK ../sorc/gfs_wafs.fd/jobs/* . | ||
cd ${pwd}/../parm ||exit 8 | ||
[[ -d wafs ]] && rm -rf wafs | ||
$LINK ../sorc/gfs_wafs.fd/parm/wafs wafs | ||
cd ${pwd}/../scripts ||exit 8 | ||
$LINK ../sorc/gfs_wafs.fd/scripts/* . | ||
cd ${pwd}/../ush ||exit 8 | ||
$LINK ../sorc/gfs_wafs.fd/ush/* . | ||
cd ${pwd}/../fix ||exit 8 | ||
[[ -d wafs ]] && rm -rf wafs | ||
$LINK ../sorc/gfs_wafs.fd/fix/* . | ||
fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This WAFS block shouldn't be getting added. Need to recheck the sync with the release/gfs.v16.3.21
branch and/or remove this block in your branch. The release/gfs.v16.4
branch will need to get synced with the prior release branches again anyway but let's remove this block now.
# The following are now explicitly in the global-workflow repository | ||
# $LINK ../sorc/gsi.fd/ush/gsi_utils.py . | ||
# $LINK ../sorc/gsi.fd/ush/calcanl_gfs.py . | ||
# $LINK ../sorc/gsi.fd/ush/calcinc_gfs.py . | ||
# $LINK ../sorc/gsi.fd/ush/getncdimlen . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to know, let's remove these lines now.
ush/jjob_header.sh
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ | |||
#! /usr/bin/env bash |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove this script from your branch. This won't go into the GFS with v16 and still needs sign off from NCO for v17.
ush/preamble.sh
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ | |||
#! /usr/bin/env bash |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove this from your branch. This won't go into the GFS with v16 and still needs sign off from NCO for v17.
ush/rstprod.sh
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | |||
#! /usr/bin/env bash | |||
|
|||
source "$HOMEgfs/ush/preamble.sh" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we definitely need this script from the v17 package then remove the preamble line.
@KateFriedman-NOAA Thank you for this review. This is exactly the type of feedback I was looking for. Just so I am clear on this, why are the |
@ADCollard The preamble and jjob_header scripts are new as of v17 and we have not yet had them signed off on by NCO. They represent a big change to how we structure the JJOB scripts so we need them approved by NCO. Both scripts are also intended to be in every JJOB/scripts script so we shouldn't partially introduce them. |
@KateFriedman-NOAA OK. I will remove them. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, left one change to make. Can rereview when moved out of draft. Thanks!
Correct prepobs version
@KateFriedman-NOAA Thanks for looking at this. Before I take this out of draft I need to test it in a cycled experiment. I am on foreign travel right now and hence cannot access WCOSS-2. I will run the test on my return on 11/26/2024. I am also inviting @EdwardSafford-NOAA to look over what I have done with the monitoring suite. |
Sounds good, thanks @ADCollard ! FYI I will be on leave the week of Thanksgiving. |
@ADCollard Monitoring changes look ok, though I think you might need to have |
Update operational workflow to work with GSI develop branch. This mostly involves changing the links to elements that have been moved out of the GSI repository since GFSv16.3. The ultimate aim is to be able to cycle with v16 workflow but using a version of GSI close to develop. This will not reproduce operations.
Resolves #3045
Type of change
Change characteristics
How has this been tested?
Testing is limited to WCOSS2. Initialised full resolution cycling experiment. Will compare to operational performance.
Checklist