Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

propose rename of set operation and add symmetric difference #16

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ties
Copy link
Member

@ties ties commented Nov 28, 2022

  • I have updated the changelog in README.md

@ties ties requested a review from erikrozendaal November 28, 2022 06:55
@ties ties changed the title Feature/propose rename of set operation propose rename of set operation and add symmetric difference Nov 28, 2022
@ties ties force-pushed the feature/propose-rename-of-set-operation branch from 392bb66 to 81b98cd Compare November 28, 2022 07:13
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ public ImmutableResourceSet remove(IpResource value) {
return new Builder(this).remove(value).build();
}

/**
* @return $this \cup that$
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think \cup is more understandable than union :)

@@ -145,6 +148,9 @@ public ImmutableResourceSet union(ImmutableResourceSet that) {
}
}

/**
* @return $this \cap that$
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants