-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 652
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wait for closeFuture
instead of close promise in NIOAsyncChannel
's executeThenClose
#3032
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d050010
Wait for closeFuture instead of close promise in executeThenClose
gjcairo e57de80
Try to fix docs
gjcairo 7ee9d27
Fix up docs
gjcairo 908ff24
Merge branch 'main' into async-channel-executethenclose
gjcairo 01c568c
Add an assertion failure if the channel's closeFuture is failed
gjcairo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure whether we decided to ignore
closeFuture
errors entirely or not – it seems completely reasonable to ignore them though.Suspect @FranzBusch has opinions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This future should never be failed; if we're considering a failing
closeFuture
the result of a bad implementation of aChannel
but not something that should happen in any other scenario, it seemed reasonable to me to ignore all errors.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original goals were:
executeThenClose
when the channel is actually closedNow 1. is still being upheld here since we wait for the
closeFuture
. It also turns out that closing can't fail and a call toclose()
must always result in the closeFuture completing. Strictly speaking succeeding actually.Now we have two options here. We can just assume that the "strict" part is true so there will never be any errors. However, there might be some code out there that actually fails the close future. What if we catch the error and add an assert that triggers if this close future actually fails to help us spot incorrect implementations?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, it just depends whether we want to help flush out the different implementations or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough, adding an assertion sounds useful.