-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move support of nanopc t6 & lts from edge to current #7476
Conversation
@@ -29,7 +28,7 @@ function post_family_tweaks__nanopct6_naming_audios() { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
# Mainline u-boot | |||
function post_family_config_branch_edge__nanopct6_use_mainline_uboot() { | |||
function post_family_config_branch_current__nanopct6_use_mainline_uboot() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I read this correctly, you're removing mainline u-boot from edge branch and adding it to current.
I believe that's not what you want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi,
That’s what I want, edge is not supported at the moment, patches are not even available, so the board would not work properly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just can't disagree more and have reverted this in my tree.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you explain the reasons, maybe I can understand why you disagree with this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, your statement is beyond nonsensical: at the present moment, both current and edge are on 6.12. So if one works, why wouldn't the other? Please revert this ASAP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok...
This reverts commit 378c64a.
This reverts commit 378c64a.
This reverts commit 378c64a.
Description
Move the support to the current kernel, tested and working fine.
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also note any relevant details for your test configuration.
Checklist:
Please delete options that are not relevant.