Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Btrfs subvolumes #239

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

silkeh
Copy link
Contributor

@silkeh silkeh commented Jul 29, 2020

This PR builds on #238 with support for having the root filesystem on a Btrfs subvolume.

Note: this is only actually this commit, as #238 is included. I will rebase after #238 is merged.

@silkeh silkeh force-pushed the extend-btrfs-support branch 3 times, most recently from 3b722c6 to 4e986e6 Compare July 30, 2020 19:00
@silkeh silkeh force-pushed the extend-btrfs-support branch from 4e986e6 to 8a1231f Compare July 4, 2021 13:06
@silkeh silkeh force-pushed the extend-btrfs-support branch from 8a1231f to 0ed68fa Compare September 11, 2021 18:36
@silkeh silkeh marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2021 18:36
@victorstewart
Copy link

is this only required for being able to boot from btrfs subvolumes? or does it also ensnare running containers as btrfs subvolumes with a swupd os-install tree installed on it?

@silkeh
Copy link
Contributor Author

silkeh commented Dec 30, 2022

is this only required for being able to boot from btrfs subvolumes?

Yes.

or does it also ensnare running containers as btrfs subvolumes with a swupd os-install tree installed on it?

This change should not have any affect on containers AFAIK, only on the way that the rootfs is mounted on early boot.

@silkeh silkeh force-pushed the extend-btrfs-support branch from 0ed68fa to 1512f82 Compare April 24, 2023 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants