-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upgrade to java 17 #7
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
</properties> | ||
|
||
<dependencies> | ||
<dependency> | ||
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-engine</artifactId> | ||
<version>5.8.0-M1</version> | ||
<version>5.9.3</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Da das Review ne Zeit hat auf sich warten lassen: es gibt inzwischen 5.10.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wollte eigentlich nur die nötigsten dependencies updaten (und die Meilenstein-Versionen loswerden). Nicht ganz konsistent, gebe ich zu. Wir können aber gerne noch eine PR machen, außerhalb des java updates wo wir generell mal die dependencies hochziehen.
@@ -15,30 +15,26 @@ | |||
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> | |||
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId> | |||
<version>3.8.1</version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
3.11.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wollte eigentlich nur die nötigsten dependencies updaten. würde die hier deshalb erstmal belassen
Verstehe deine Intention @wolfgang-janz . Dann passt es für mich so im Kontext Java17 Upgrade. Ein eigener PR, um mal die Dependencies auf die aktuellen Stand zu bringen, fände ich allerdings sinnvoll. |
No description provided.