Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: infer instance architecture from a heuristic #4920

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

pb8o
Copy link
Contributor

@pb8o pb8o commented Nov 20, 2024

This helps the script work for instances it doesn't know about, which is helpful while onboarding new instances.

Only Graviton metal instances are aarch64 at the moment.

Fixes: c33bc6c

Changes

There's a better solution using StrEnum, but the python that runs this script does not support that.

Reason

To be able to use the script with instances it does not know about. I.e. --instance mX.metal

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
    automated style checks.
  • I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
    how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
  • I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
    in the PR.
  • I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • When making API changes, I have followed the
    Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
    integration tests.
  • I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

@pb8o pb8o added Priority: Medium Indicates than an issue or pull request should be resolved ahead of issues or pull requests labelled Type: Fix Indicates a fix to existing code labels Nov 20, 2024
@pb8o pb8o self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
@pb8o pb8o marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2024 12:40
This helps the script work for instances it doesn't know about, which is
helpful while onboarding new instances.

Only Graviton metal instances are aarch64 at the moment.

Fixes: c33bc6c
Signed-off-by: Pablo Barbáchano <[email protected]>
@pb8o pb8o added the Status: Awaiting author Indicates that an issue or pull request requires author action label Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.07%. Comparing base (5487c06) to head (fb57a5f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4920   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.07%   84.07%           
=======================================
  Files         251      251           
  Lines       28067    28067           
=======================================
  Hits        23597    23597           
  Misses       4470     4470           
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-c5n.metal 84.64% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m5n.metal 84.62% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6a.metal 83.93% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6g.metal 80.75% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6i.metal 84.62% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7g.metal 80.75% <ø> (ø)
6.1-c5n.metal 84.64% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m5n.metal 84.62% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m6a.metal 83.93% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6g.metal 80.74% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6i.metal 84.63% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7g.metal 80.75% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@pb8o pb8o added Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed and removed Status: Awaiting author Indicates that an issue or pull request requires author action labels Nov 20, 2024
@roypat roypat merged commit a101628 into firecracker-microvm:main Nov 20, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@pb8o pb8o deleted the ci-infer-arch branch November 20, 2024 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority: Medium Indicates than an issue or pull request should be resolved ahead of issues or pull requests labelled Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed Type: Fix Indicates a fix to existing code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants