Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
note expressions extension #354
base: next
Are you sure you want to change the base?
note expressions extension #354
Changes from 1 commit
4fe8006
cdfc77a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Following the new convention that omits any reference to "draft".
EDIT: Changed it to start at 1 instead of 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also the plugin id convention says that it should start at 1.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At first I thought baking the current number of note expressions into the value of the "ALL" option would introduce an ABI incompatibility if you were to add another note expression to this enum in the future, but thinking about it some more, I think it might be fine - at least from an ABI standpoint.
One potential issue is if you later introduce a special enum value which is incompatible with some of the other values - that could complicate things.
But the bigger issue would occur if a plugin author upgraded to a newer CLAP API version which introduced a new enum value. If they were relying on the old value for "ALL", this would silently introduce a bug when the plugin author recompiles their plugin because now they would be advertising that they support a note expression that they do not actually support.
For that reason, I would remove the "ALL" mask. It's not strictly necessary to have anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this is a bitmask enum and the intent is to be able to set it with | and query it with &
if you add an enum that doesn’t change but the value of all would add another bit
I guess my view is: the most common case is to say as a plug-in you want all note expressions or none. Those two should be idiomatic and easy. Having to | together the list of every expression is pretty tedious. We can add a const value outside the enum if you want which is just the | of all values (or in the enum) but im not sure what would break if you did that other than people using == vs & improperly would experience a break
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Modified the formatting and conventions to be consistent with the rest of the CLAP API