Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move all CDATA section tests into one file #170

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

not-my-profile
Copy link

All other initial states are referenced outside the section 13.2.5 Tokenization1 that describes the tokenizer state machine.

It's therefore reasonable to consider the 'CDATA section state' an implementation detail and as such a tokenizer may choose to avoid exposing it in it's public API.

In that scenario while all other tests could be integration tests that solely use the public API, the tests for the 'CDATA section state' would need to be performed internally rather than externally.

This commit moves all the 'CDATA section state' tests into a new separate cdataSection.test file to faciliate such testing.

All other initial states are referenced outside the section 13.2.5
Tokenization[1] that describes the tokenizer state machine.

It's therefore reasonable to consider the 'CDATA section state'
an implementation detail and as such a tokenizer may choose to
avoid exposing it in it's public API.

In that scenario while all other tests could be integration tests
that solely use the public API, the tests for the 'CDATA section state'
would need to be performed internally rather than externally.

This commit moves all the 'CDATA section state' tests into a new
separate cdataSection.test file to faciliate such testing.

[1]: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/parsing.html#tokenization
@annevk
Copy link
Contributor

annevk commented Aug 17, 2023

To be clear, given that there's only a very high-level public API defined, most things are probably implementation details. Seems reasonable to move things around though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants