Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup untracked workshop files in git #1918

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2022

Conversation

dgarrett622
Copy link
Collaborator

@dgarrett622 dgarrett622 commented Jul 27, 2022


Pull Request Description

What issue does this change request address? (Use "#" before the issue to link it, i.e., #42.)

Continues #1806

What are the significant changes in functionality due to this change request?

No changes to functionality. Cleans up untracked workshop/test files in git.


For Change Control Board: Change Request Review

The following review must be completed by an authorized member of the Change Control Board.

  • 1. Review all computer code.
  • 2. If any changes occur to the input syntax, there must be an accompanying change to the user manual and xsd schema. If the input syntax change deprecates existing input files, a conversion script needs to be added (see Conversion Scripts).
  • 3. Make sure the Python code and commenting standards are respected (camelBack, etc.) - See on the wiki for details.
  • 4. Automated Tests should pass, including run_tests, pylint, manual building and xsd tests. If there are changes to Simulation.py or JobHandler.py the qsub tests must pass.
  • 5. If significant functionality is added, there must be tests added to check this. Tests should cover all possible options. Multiple short tests are preferred over one large test. If new development on the internal JobHandler parallel system is performed, a cluster test must be added setting, in XML block, the node <internalParallel> to True.
  • 6. If the change modifies or adds a requirement or a requirement based test case, the Change Control Board's Chair or designee also needs to approve the change. The requirements and the requirements test shall be in sync.
  • 7. The merge request must reference an issue. If the issue is closed, the issue close checklist shall be done.
  • 8. If an analytic test is changed/added is the the analytic documentation updated/added?
  • 9. If any test used as a basis for documentation examples (currently found in raven/tests/framework/user_guide and raven/docs/workshop) have been changed, the associated documentation must be reviewed and assured the text matches the example.

@moosebuild
Copy link

All jobs on 65fdfd1 : invalidated by @wangcj05

@moosebuild
Copy link

Job Test qsubs sawtooth on 65fdfd1 : invalidated by @dgarrett622

tests timed out

@wangcj05
Copy link
Collaborator

PR looks good, and checklist is satisfied.

@wangcj05 wangcj05 merged commit b2f9c7f into idaholab:devel Aug 10, 2022
@dgarrett622 dgarrett622 deleted the git_workshop_cleanup branch August 10, 2022 16:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants