review comment from Ronald

peps/pep-0733.rst

@@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ paradigms or languages, such as
 `PyGObject <https://pygobject.readthedocs.io/en/latest/>`__ for GTK,
 `Pygolo <https://gitlab.com/pygolo/py>`__ for Go,
 `PyJNIus <https://github.com/kivy/pyjnius/>`__ for Java,
+`PyObjC <https://pyobjc.readthedocs.io>`__ for Objective-C,
 `SWIG <https://swig.org/>`__ for C/C++, or
 `Python.NET <https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet>`__ for .NET (C#).
 
@@ -380,8 +381,8 @@ or pointers to parts of the internal structure of an object
 (such as ``PyBytes_AsString``)
 [`Issue 57 <https://github.com/capi-workgroup/problems/issues/57>`__].
 In both cases, the reference/pointer is valid for as long as the
-owning object is alive, but this time is hard to reason about. Such
-functions should not exist in the API without a mechanism that can
+owning object holds the reference, but this time is hard to reason about.
+Such functions should not exist in the API without a mechanism that can
 make them safe.
 
 For containers, the API is currently missing bulk operations on the