You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello!
Thanks for building such a streamlined tool for analyzing chromatin conformation capture data. I noticed a quirk when starting from bam files (--start-stage bam). It seems like calculation for number of reads in each bam file is off by an order of magnitude? I don't think that it affects any of the downstream processing, but wanted to report this.
hicstuff header:
INFO :: ## hicstuff: v3.2.3 log file
INFO :: ## date: 2024-06-18 12:42:29
INFO :: ## enzyme: AluI
INFO :: ## input1: /N/slate/rhackley/01_poreC_test/sup-output/paired_end/R1-renamed.bam
INFO :: ## input2: /N/slate/rhackley/01_poreC_test/sup-output/paired_end/R2-renamed.bam
INFO :: The default output format is now `.cool`. The Hi-C matrix will be generated with cooler v0.10.0 (Abdennur & Mirny, Bioinformatics 2020).
INFO :: Checking content of bam files.
INFO :: 86725 reads found in each bam file.
INFO :: 86% reads (single ends) mapped with Q >= 30 (1483586/1734508)
INFO :: 741793 pairs successfully mapped (855.34%)
Hello!
Thanks for building such a streamlined tool for analyzing chromatin conformation capture data. I noticed a quirk when starting from bam files (
--start-stage bam
). It seems like calculation for number of reads in each bam file is off by an order of magnitude? I don't think that it affects any of the downstream processing, but wanted to report this.hicstuff header:
samtools flagstat R1.bam
returns:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: