-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lit cheat sheet #1355
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Lit cheat sheet #1355
Conversation
A live preview of this PR will be available at the URL(s) below. https://pr1355-18538bf---lit-dev-5ftespv5na-uc.a.run.app/ |
Whoa, awesome!!! I'm reading through now and my first/only comment is that some of the example are really long compared to their main topic. I think the Templating section has the most of this. eg, the event listener expression example could just be a single button and an output element (similar to the common counter example) without validation, etc. It would be great to get in small Task and Context example too, and may an ElementInternals thing (custom state?). |
I was uploading this in hopes of getting something up and running in the live preview. Also I'm not sure how much I can contribute to this because coming up with and subsequently plowing through the boilerplate for example takes up a lot more time than expected and my calendar is getting filled up with other work. My plan forward was either of the following:
|
I can definitely contribute to refining this branch! This is such a good start. |
let me debug get this working in the preview first! |
lol it was a real bug and not a flake. good job, tests! |
I've read through it and it will be a gold mine. I have the same thought as Justin about section length. One thing that stod out was the mention of running on the server in the lifecycle section. Seems a little premature given that the SSR package is still in labs. I think that the lifecycle section could be compacted into a table instead. Would it be reasonable to include a short glossary section? I have a couple of smaller suggestions with the text but I get the impression that we don't want to put these here but in a separate PR. |
Thanks for the look-over Filimon! The nice thing about articles is that they have more of a chance to live as a living document, so lifecycle reference can change over time. Though I do think that this information is very useful for people trying to actually use our SSR package and we should strive to make it easier to use. I also agree with you and think that there needs to be some sort of "labs" warning near that |
Could you write a page about Lit vs React? With comparisons all Lit + Signal solutions instead of React hooks. resources: |
b82f44e
to
6ceb3fb
Compare
Can I get another review? I'd like to get this out before thanksgiving or by cyber monday |
I've added a bunch of sections and a signals section |
I have looked it over but not at every detail as it is a lot to go through but this looks really good. A common misconception is around converters is that they are run when the property is set. Your example does not make it worse as it is clear enough but maybe add a warning/note making that extra clear? I think that a pattern around derived state is probably nice to have to. Maybe with I have not worked enough with signals to have meaningful feedback. Really well done! |
Thanks for the suggestion @filimon-danopoulos, I added that note in custom attribute converters and I also added 4 examples for:
|
Why update and not updated? |
@sorvell it happens before render and does not rely on the DOM. In particular the example uses |
ping @justinfagnani @sorvell @augustjk for a review If ready to merge, we should also prepare socials as I no longer have access |
|
||
{% aside "warn" %} | ||
|
||
By turning off shadow DOM you lose the benefits of encapsulation, DOM scoping, and `<slot>` elements. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By turning off shadow DOM you lose the benefits of encapsulation, DOM scoping, and `<slot>` elements. | |
This is generally not recommended, but it may sometimes be worthwhile for integration with older systems or libraries that may not be updated to work with Shadow DOM. | |
By turning off shadow DOM you lose the benefits of encapsulation, DOM scoping, and `<slot>` elements. |
|
||
By turning off shadow DOM you lose the benefits of encapsulation, DOM scoping, and `<slot>` elements. | ||
|
||
Since the Shadow root no longer exists, Lit will no longer handle the `static styles` property for you. You must decide how to handle your styles. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the Shadow root no longer exists, Lit will no longer handle the `static styles` property for you. You must decide how to handle your styles. | |
Since the Shadow root no longer exists, `<slot>` does not work and Lit will no longer handle the `static styles` property for you. You must decide how to handle your styles. |
// localStorage is only available in the browser so we put this reactive | ||
// property reconciliation in an update() method. | ||
if (changed.has('savedString')) { | ||
localStorage.setItem('savedString', this.savedString); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
localStorage.setItem('savedString', this.savedString); | |
window.localStorage.setItem('savedString', this.savedString); |
localStorage.setItem('savedString', this.savedString); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (localStorage.get('savedString') !== this.savedString) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if (localStorage.get('savedString') !== this.savedString) { | |
if (window.localStorage.getItem('savedString') !== this.savedString) { |
} | ||
|
||
if (localStorage.get('savedString') !== this.savedString) { | ||
this.savedString = localStorage.getItem('savedString') ?? ''; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this.savedString = localStorage.getItem('savedString') ?? ''; | |
this.savedString = window.localStorage.getItem('savedString') ?? ''; |
- You can't use the `@query` decorator (or its JS equivalent) | ||
- You cannot determine when an element will be rendered | ||
- You need to pass element references from a child to a parent component (not common) | ||
- You're migrating from another framework like React |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- You're migrating from another framework like React | |
- You're migrating from another framework like React | |
- You need to run a function when the referenced element changes |
|
||
{% aside "warn" %} | ||
|
||
Effects implemented in this way are not compatible with the `watch()` directive. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does this mean?
I think this section is confusing and should be limited to just referencing the effect in signal-utils
.
render() { | ||
return html` | ||
${ | ||
// NOTE: the live() directive prevents setting the .value property if |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would remove live
here and the comment. As long as the tag doesn't change, the expense is minimal.
// This is important since static html templates should not be thrashed | ||
// due to performance concerns. | ||
staticHTML` | ||
<${this.tagLiteral} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why doesn't this use unsafeStatic
or literal
?
|
||
{% aside "warn" %} | ||
|
||
Be careful when using static HTML templates as changing values of a static |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are cached but the caching is slightly more expensive. Instead I would just draw attention to the cost of changing element tags.
See it here:
https://pr1355-f7f7b43---lit-dev-5ftespv5na-uc.a.run.app/articles/lit-cheat-sheet/
This PR also adds lazy loading to lit-example via intersection observer so that we do not load the 300kb TS worker a million times per page and so that it can cache.