Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to doobie 1.0.0-RC6 #406

Conversation

felix-hedenstrom
Copy link

@felix-hedenstrom felix-hedenstrom commented Sep 19, 2024

Read/Write derivation is no longer on by default and require these import doobie.implicits.* imports as described in the release notes
https://github.com/typelevel/doobie/releases/tag/v1.0.0-RC6

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.71%. Comparing base (10a084d) to head (0db3367).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #406   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.71%   85.71%           
=======================================
  Files          63       63           
  Lines         511      511           
  Branches       34       34           
=======================================
  Hits          438      438           
  Misses         73       73           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@felix-hedenstrom
Copy link
Author

Doobie now recommends that you don't use RC6 and wait for RC7. I'll close this PR

https://github.com/typelevel/doobie/releases/tag/v1.0.0-RC6

Warning: We have an issue in this release related to automatic derivation not using explicitly defined instances (See typelevel/doobie#2104). Please refrain from using this release and skip to 1.0.0-RC7 when it is out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants