Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate RSA key reading from login decoding #210

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

notjuanortiz
Copy link
Contributor

@notjuanortiz notjuanortiz commented Feb 29, 2020

Motivation

I had a difficult time writing clean code to programmatically add new RSA keys (#179) due to how tightly-coupled key reading and authentication logic were.

Result

Separates the responsibility of reading RSA keys from authentication logic. It is written in such a way that is open to extensibility and closed for modification so that developers can define custom key read/write implementations without breaking any adjacent systems.

This also introduces a new package io.luna.security.

@TravisBuddy
Copy link

Hey @notjuanortiz,
Your changes look good to me!

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 40f9a230-5b29-11ea-b66e-89572c858fbd

@notjuanortiz notjuanortiz changed the title Separate RSA key pair reading from login decoding Separate RSA key reading from login decoding Feb 29, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 15, 2020

This issue has been marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix An issue that went stale or won't be resolved. label May 15, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 22, 2020

This issue has been closed because it has not had any recent activity. Feel free to re-open this issue or create another one if the problem isn't resolved.

@stale stale bot closed this May 22, 2020
@lare96 lare96 reopened this Dec 28, 2020
@lare96 lare96 removed the wontfix An issue that went stale or won't be resolved. label Dec 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants