Ignore disabled fields

[wmadden]

No description provided.

[wmadden]

@samccone yes.

[wmadden]

@samccone #70 (comment)

[samccone]

I should have been more clear, it is a good choice to do it in this code path.
Given where this logic lives It seems like this would be a hard thing to disable if someone wanted to for whatever reason.

What do you think @wmadden

[wmadden]

Good point @samccone. I'd still opt to ignore disabled elements by default since that's the behaviour implemented by browsers. I think if someone wants to specifically include their disabled elements they can do so by a) not disabling them (greying them out in CSS for example) or b) opening their own pull request.

[wmadden]

@samccone I rewrote it using @rhubarbselleven's type selection code. This is now easy for people to customize if they want to.

I'm also requesting that you update your major branch to this point, since the type selector changes were only available on master.

[wmadden]

@samccone any progress here?

[samccone]

Lgtm 👍 @rhubarbselleven Want to give it the once over

[rhubarbselleven]

💥

Thanks guys.