Don't require nsatz in exp.v #1020
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
proux01
added
the
TODO: MC2 port
This avoid having coqchk on probability.v report about axioms of the stdlib (although it still reports about all primitive int and float primitives, due to coq-elpi offering some interface to them).
proux01
force-pushed
the
exp_no_nsatz
branch
from
03b96b7 to
d499a84
Compare
proux01
removed
the
TODO: MC2 port
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This avoid having coqchk on probability.v report about axioms of the stdlib (although it still reports about all primitive int and float primitives, due to coq-elpi offering some interface to them).
Motivation for this change
Things done/to do
added corresponding entries inCHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.mdadded corresponding documentation in the headersCompatibility with MathComp 2.0
TODO: HB portto make sure someone ports this PR tothe
hierarchy-builderbranch or I already opened an issue or PR (please cross reference).Automatic note to reviewers
Read this Checklist and put a milestone if possible.