-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
change inequality in ereal_{d,}nbhs and {p,n}infty_{d,}nbhs #487
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
5a4a8ea
to
0a11a30
Compare
0a11a30
to
b426af7
Compare
55724fb
to
919efcc
Compare
IIRC, the problem with this PR is that it does not bring the expected code size reduction. But there is now code size augmentation (except with one lemma). Since we all seem to agree that large inequalities fell better suited, we can maybe merge this PR for now. What do you think? |
I think this PR essentially exibits a lack of abstraction. We should actually understand how to make the code smaller, and I think it might not be about changing the def. |
7fbcf48
to
5929a80
Compare
5929a80
to
cc6d238
Compare
afd2f59
to
cdacbaf
Compare
cdacbaf
to
a811911
Compare
a811911
to
1c54ead
Compare
b719baa
to
2b10bdc
Compare
NB: after a rebase on MathComp 1.3.1, the proofs of the lemmas |
572778e
to
3b9c43b
Compare
3b9c43b
to
26740c7
Compare
- from strict to large - also in {p,n}infty_{d,}nbhs closed #122
26740c7
to
a0e6d38
Compare
ereal.v
closed #122 @CohenCyril
This is globally getting a bit bigger (only a few proofs are shortened).
I have maybe not been careful enough when updating.